[img=http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/reef040811/s_r06_0RTXVODX.jpg]
Stunning!
[img=http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/reef040811/s_r13_73011725.jpg]
Hmmm... :/ So... all that metal (maybe plumb) is actually good for the sea?
Hmmm... :/ So... all that metal (maybe plumb) is actually good for the sea?
Great post, >
According to The Ocean Conservancy, a Washington-based environmental group,
"There's little evidence that artificial reefs have a net benefit", citing concerns such as toxicity, damage to ecosystems and concentrating fish into one place (worsening overfishing)
http://www.oceanconservancy.org/
According to The Ocean Conservancy, a Washington-based environmental group, "There's little evidence that artificial reefs have a net benefit", citing concerns such as toxicity, damage to ecosystems and concentrating fish into one place (worsening overfishing)
http://www.oceanconservancy.org/
Good post!
But I honestly do not think it's too good for nature, right?
was there any text that went with this post? i would love to know more about each of these photos. it seems like a lot more than underwater reefs.
also do you have a source?
Create Post
The post is made up of the author's original content, or is a compliation of material from various places.
8 comments
Stunning!
Hmmm... :/ So... all that metal (maybe plumb) is actually good for the sea?
According to The Ocean Conservancy, a Washington-based environmental group,
"There's little evidence that artificial reefs have a net benefit", citing concerns such as toxicity, damage to ecosystems and concentrating fish into one place (worsening overfishing)
http://www.oceanconservancy.org/
But I honestly do not think it's too good for nature, right?
WOW
also do you have a source?